Monday 27 January 2020

I'm nobody, who are you

Facebook is the “high school reunion from Hell”. Twitter is the “hosepipe of hatred”. Instagram is “Twitter for people who can't or won't read”. WhatsApp is the “official disinformation channel”.  These are all descriptions of social media – on social media. And the love-hate relationships that we have with this latest form of self-expression is both bewildering and addictive.

There have been reams written about the nature of our love for social media - the allure of self-presentation, the dopamine rush with every comment or like on a post, and the transformation of our very lives as social media performance.

All that is true - and social media is often depressing, frustrating, invidious. Women tend to face horrendous abuse and threats of rape and mutilation. Political arguments lose all nuance and turn into slugfests and shouting matches. Language is often vile. And the other aspect, that of one’s circle of friends and peers, turns on exclusivity, exotic holidays, the preciousness of precocious children - all leading to FOMO, the fear of missing out - a word that the Oxford Dictionary added way back in 2013.

But.

If you can accept that you will never have a life as interesting as your friends on Instagram or Facebook, that you will never know more than the economist or historian on Twitter, and you’re prepared to stay away from people you interact with on a regular basis in real life while on social media, there is so much scope for learning new things, to be entertained, to be amazed and to be provoked into thought.

It’s how you discover that the late Sultan Qaboos of Oman was a great fan of British light opera and Gilbert and Sullivan - and one of the reasons he led a coup against his father was that his father had stormed into his room and smashed his favourite record (the Pirates of Penzance). It’s finding out that both Gordon Greenidge and Vivian Richards made their test debuts here in this city, in 1974 - and Greenidge became the first West Indian to score a test century on debut while overseas. Or that we use the ‘x’ as the multiplication sign because of the efforts of a clergyman named WIlliam Oughtred, back in 1631. Or that the Marathi broadcaster and novelist Venu Chitale began her career at the BBC in 1940 as secretary to author George Orwell. Or that there is a kind of mollusc called the disco clam which uses a system of flashing lights to protect itself from predators. Its finding pictures of “beauties from Lucknow”, dating back to 1874. It’s finding out that Mary Burchell, an author of more than 110 Mills & Boon romance novels, used the money she made to save Jewish families from the Nazis before World War II.

And there’s subject-focused social media - virtual gatherings of old film fans, antiquarians, bibliophiles, mathematicians, astronomers, nature lovers - whose postings renew interest in things that you had hoped you’d left behind you, which went under the stultifying names of mathematics and biology and physics from your days in school or college; or bring to your attention films you should be seeing or books you should be reading - classics that no longer are on bestseller lists or the box office charts. And when you go from reading about books to reading them, and talking about them, from watching clips to watching a long forgotten classic that still retains its charm, your life is enriched.

Yes, posting a photo of yourself in exotic surroundings, looking as good as you van, artfully enhanced by tints and filters, and seeing the likes pour in can be immensely satisfying. So is making a smart comment about the state of the nation or the world, stimulating a comment chain a hundred posts long. But unless you’re a celebrity, with people waiting to engage with you, hanging on your every image or utterance, this is not going to happen. And when it does, it is usually accompanied by hateful remarks, ad-hominem insults, and general pettiness.

But if you are content with having fifty friends or followers - of which 40 may be bots, but are willing to follow hundreds of people who have interesting things to say, if you’re willing to prune your friends’ lists and following lists regularly and often, social media can be so rewarding. But if you keep trying to make that popular post, that viral video, that great selfie, you’ve just ended up “public, like a frog”, telling your name the livelong June, to an admiring (or otherwise) bog.

--------------------
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/im-nobody-who-are-you/articleshow/73616060.cms

Monday 13 January 2020

Dark Souls, James Joyce and Reading resolutions

I just finished Dark Souls.
For those people who are not videogame inclined, Dark Souls is the first of a genre of fiendishly difficult games that require boundless patience, close observation, and agility of mind and response (and fingers) to get through - at least on the first playthrough.

Such stuff as  nightmares are made on: The big guy grinds you to pulp with that hammer - and the little guy(who is three feet taller than you are,  skewers you with his spear - which shoots lightning
It’s almost an exercise in masochism - but, as you get better at understanding the games rhythms and patterns, you get better at dealing with the challenges it throws at you - and overcoming those challenges leads to a such a satisfying payoff.

I first started the game - when it came out in 2011. It received rave reviews from people in the industry I respected, so I bought it.
I played it for four hours - and was unable to progress beyond the tutorial. I switched to something less demanding.
Yesterday, I finished the game. And it left me thrilled, satisfied - and drained.
And I have to decide whether to play it again - or start on its even harder sequel.

Which brings me to Joyce.
Many years back, I tried reading Ulysses. I got half-way through the first chapter, but found it tough going. I gave up. It was in some ways, reinforcement of my own snobbery. This was all “literary stuff”, and it was for pseuds and self-proclaimed “intellectuals”, I told myself - and went back to my Wodehouses,my Clubland heroes and James Bond.
But over time, at various times in the past couple of decades, I have been seeing so much more of people writing why Joyce was special. And this year - pushed by book Twitter - I’ve made a resolution.
I’m going to finish Ulysses.

It maybe, like Dark Souls, there may be times when I think I can’t handle it anymore. There may be times I want to throw the book across the room. But then, there’s also the possibility that I will get the books patterns and rhythms - and find the same kind of exhilaration that I did from the game that I abandoned nine years ago.
When I was a child, my mother used to tell me “Some books are like grapes, you just consume them as they are. Some are like bananas. You have to peel the skin off, before you get to the tasty part. Still others are like coconuts. You have to break the outer shell, strip the intermediate fibre, and then get through the inner shell, before you get to the juice and the sweetness of the kernel”.
So that’s my resolution. To crack open Ulysses and get to the kernel. Whether I find it tasty or not is another matter, but hello again, stately, plump Buck Mulligan.